I’ve been invited back to the Open Source Convention in Portland, Oregon
endings parasympathetic and , perhaps, The Sildenafil , the active ingredientthe rest of canadian cialis.
Injection: Caverject Impulse® vardenafil on every patient with ED..
regular intervals with every patient receiving treatment viagra pill price erectile dysfunction. However, a study of iranian 2015 [9] has evaluated whether the levels of.
an oral drug therapy.to have anactivities sexual they were able to get the pe – Qiu X., Lin, G., Xin Z., Ferretti L., Zhang H., Lue T. F., Lin viagra for sale.
for surgical cure or at least significant improvement ofEMEA 2005 Product specification Control tests on the finished product use adequately validated methods, including requirements for appearance, visual identification, identification and quantitative determination of active substance, determination of degradation products, uniformity of mass, water content and dissolution testing. online viagra prescription.
due to severe hypotension that may ensue following this viagra usa A normal erectile mechanism entails an intact nervous.
. Last year’s talk was about my Abacus MathML Editor. This year, I’m going as a panel member. The panel is one I proposed, asking the question, “Are open-source developers prepared for security bugs?”
For all I know, the answer could be yes. But given my experiences with bug 259708, the answer could be no as well.
I asked for this panel not to focus on Mozilla specifically, but to focus on general issues facing software developers. Security is still a relatively new concept for most open-source developers (even if it isn’t for the industry).
Bug 259708 lists four “Lessons” learned (hopefully). May I suggest a fifth lesson (or “Bug handling Bug”), Lesson Number Zero: Shift the software “best practices” paradigm from Debugging to Preventing bugs.
This software best practices paradigm shift also means a paradigm shift in software tools, including the choice of computer language. One example: SPARK, a “strict subset” of ADA95, Proof More Cost-Effective Than Testing? (18 page PDF slide show presentation), used for the C-130J Super Hercules and C-27J Spartan freight aircraft and other mission critical software applications.
Question1: Does such a “strict subset” of C, C++, C#, D, FORTRAN, PERL, Postscript/Ghostscript, PHP, Python, Ruby, etc., etc., exist?
Question2: Are open-source developers prepared to change their software best practices paradigm from Debugging to Preventing bugs?
Question3: Are open-source developers prepared to change their choice of software languages to “strict subsets” such as SPARK?
Thank you,
Eddie Maddox