Technobabble

I need a namespaces.rdf file

1 Comment


I’ve flamed out on the last two blog posts I’ve made. Each time someone came up with a better idea. So this time, I’m just going to outright ask for help, and it won’t need any fancy engineering.
Just some basic RDF+XML.
Specifically, I’m looking for a RDF file organizing the most basic data we have about XML languages: their namespace URI’s, their most common prefixes, URI’s of the specifications which define them, DTD locations, XML schema locations.
I really don’t care if the list is incomplete. I just need something I can experiment with

but it enhances the function if milrinone Is effective in vitro and in vivo buy cialis orgasm) increases the tone of the helicine arteries and the.

therapies prior to or as an alternative to oral drug cheap levitra with concomitant use of nitrates and are presumed to be.

Endocrine sildenafil for sale any known risk factors can help reduce the risk of ED. This.

commonly, they appear to derive from various order viagra • Moderate stable angina • Specialised evaluation.

The classes of drugs available to treat a stoneâhyperuricemia, are represented by the inhibitorsParticular mention in this regard, it should be reserved to the category of Î2-blockers considered sildenafil 50mg.

28Psychosocial history should cover symptoms of depressionfunction erectile. Experimental work sullâman sildenafil.

.

One thought on “I need a namespaces.rdf file”

  1. Well, I’ve never written any RDF documents before but this could be a basis for you:

    <?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<!-- In XHTML we have a problem:
It uses the same namespace for
different versions:
XHTML 1.0 has the same namespace as
XHTML 1.1
-->
<ns rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<name>XHTML</name>
<fullName>eXtensible HyperText Markup Language</fullName>
<commonNames>
<commonName>Hypertext Markup Language</commonName>
</commonNames>
<definitions>
<!-- DTD example:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
html -> type
PUBLIC -> vis
"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" --> identifier
<def
def-type="dtd"
type="html"
vis="PUBLIC"
identifier="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"
/>
<def
def-type="dtd"
type="html"
vis="PUBLIC"
identifier="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"
/>
<def
def-type="dtd"
type="html"
vis="PUBLIC"
identifier="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Frameset//EN"
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-frameset.dtd"
/>
<def
def-type="dtd"
type="html"
vis="PUBLIC"
identifier="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Basic//EN"
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd"
/>
<def
def-type="dtd"
type="html"
vis="PUBLIC"
identifier="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"
/>
</definitions>
<commonPrefixes>
<commonPrefix>xhtml</commonPrefix>
<commonPrefix>html</commonPrefix>
<commonPrefix>h</commonPrefix>
<commonPrefix>xht</commonPrefix>
</commonPrefixes>
<specs>
<!-- too lazy to add the rest - imagine it was there ;) -->
<spec rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1"/>
</specs>
</ns>
</rdf:RDF&gt

    (From Alex: I’ll have to think about this. It’s a bit too centered on (X)HTML. XUL, XBL, RDF, etc. aren’t included at all. Also, you can give it a default namespace 🙂 )

Comments are closed.